http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/milvetz-v-united-states/ Bankruptcy Attorney Blogs and Directory Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:52:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/milvetz-v-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-2483 Has The Milavetz Decision Eviscerated The Earmarking Doctrine and Simultaneously Expanded The Trustee’s Avoidance Powers? | Bankruptcy Questions? - National Bankruptcy Forum Mon, 17 May 2010 21:09:36 +0000 http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=1356#comment-2483 [...] to be seen is whether the prohibitions contained in Milavetz prevent advising clients of this loop hole in the preference laws.  After all, for the earmarking [...] [...] to be seen is whether the prohibitions contained in Milavetz prevent advising clients of this loop hole in the preference laws.  After all, for the earmarking [...]

]]> http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/milvetz-v-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-2404 Breaking Down the Milavetz Decision Part 1: Debt Relief Agency = Bankruptcy Attorney? | Bankruptcy Questions? - National Bankruptcy Forum Sun, 21 Mar 2010 21:00:50 +0000 http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=1356#comment-2404 [...] behalf of creditor clients were “debt collectors” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Milavetz had a very tough hill to climb. The contention that the definition of debt relief agency does not [...] [...] behalf of creditor clients were “debt collectors” under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Milavetz had a very tough hill to climb. The contention that the definition of debt relief agency does not [...]

]]> http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/milvetz-v-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-2396 Law on Rice » Blog Archive » Early reactions to Milavetz around the blogospher Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:14:56 +0000 http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=1356#comment-2396 [...] 169th birthday. While Washington State bankruptcy lawyer Jay Jump lamented the decision as a lose-lose proposition for lawyers and their clients alike and rings the free speech warning siren in the process (maybe rightly) at the National Bankruptcy [...] [...] 169th birthday. While Washington State bankruptcy lawyer Jay Jump lamented the decision as a lose-lose proposition for lawyers and their clients alike and rings the free speech warning siren in the process (maybe rightly) at the National Bankruptcy [...]

]]> http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/milvetz-v-united-states/comment-page-1/#comment-2395 Julio Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:13:58 +0000 http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=1356#comment-2395 The decision leaves way more questions than it answers. The decision leaves way more questions than it answers.

]]>