<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Bankruptcy Forum &#187; Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/category/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com</link>
	<description>Bankruptcy Attorney Blogs and Directory</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>I’m Not Current on May Car Payments, Do I Have Options in Chapter 13?</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/im-not-current-on-may-car-payments-do-i-have-options-in-chapter-13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/im-not-current-on-may-car-payments-do-i-have-options-in-chapter-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Trezza</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona Bankruptcy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Discharge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creditor Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Collector Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protecting Your Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repossession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Can I keep my property if I file bankruptcy?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chapter 13 plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions about bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[should I file for bankruptcy?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=9775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Bankruptcy Help When You&#8217;re Behind on Your Car Payments? When you are considering bankruptcy, you have often been behind on payments for months.  You have run up credit card debt, and missed payments on your car and mortgage.  And now, perhaps your lender is threatening to repossess your car.  What are your options in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/im-not-current-on-may-car-payments-do-i-have-options-in-chapter-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Prospective Employers Deny You Employment Because You Filed for Bankruptcy?</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-and-your-career/can-prospective-employers-deny-you-employment-because-you-filed-for-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-and-your-career/can-prospective-employers-deny-you-employment-because-you-filed-for-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jordan Slattery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy and Your Career]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-deficiency legislation BACPA Bankruptcy bankruptcy and divorce bankruptcy attorney bankruptcy discharge bankruptcy exemptions bankruptcy reform Chapter 7 Chapter 13 bankruptcy Chapter 13 Bankrupt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy and Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix Bankrtupcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pima County Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protecting assets in bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[should I file for bankruptcy?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=9772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Previously, I discussed the bankruptcy rule that employers cannot fire or otherwise discriminate against employees because they filed for bankruptcy.  However, I also mentioned the difficulty in sometimes proving the causation element between the filing and the discrimination, and the fact that a bankruptcy will still come up on credit checks and other types of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-and-your-career/can-prospective-employers-deny-you-employment-because-you-filed-for-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Filings Lower in Arizona Than Last Year</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/bankruptcy-filings-lower-in-arizona-than-last-year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/bankruptcy-filings-lower-in-arizona-than-last-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Trezza</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coping with Stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creditor Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Collector Harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney tucson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phoenix bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tempe Bankruptcy Attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucson bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=8616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Filings Lower in Tucson, Arizona and Phoenix, Arizona Than Last Year Arizona bankruptcies have been declining in number for the last 9 months.   Statewide filings fell 23 percent in October of 2011, and overall bankruptcy filings are down 13 percent from 2010 so far this year. Bankruptcy has been filed more than 106,000 times [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/bankruptcy-filings-lower-in-arizona-than-last-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re: Rankin, No. 10-62340-13</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/in-re-rankin-no-10-62340-13/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/in-re-rankin-no-10-62340-13/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Trezza</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arizona Bankruptcy Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[letting go of a home in bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[should I file for bankruptcy?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=8438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In re: Rankin, No. 10-62340-13 (Bankr. D. Mont., January 21, 2011). &#160; When you file for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you propose to the bankruptcy court your plan to repay what you owe to your creditors.  There are many requirements that each plan must meet in order to be approved by the court and put in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/in-re-rankin-no-10-62340-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>San Jose Bankruptcy Lawyers Raise Concerns over Perceived Trustee Abuses</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/san-jose-bankruptcy-lawyers-raise-concerns-over-perceived-trustee-abuses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/san-jose-bankruptcy-lawyers-raise-concerns-over-perceived-trustee-abuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 02:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jon G. Brooks</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Bankruptcy Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics of Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=7249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At a recent meeting of our Chapter 13 Committee meeting, a group of Bay Area bankruptcy attorneys who meet monthly to discuss recent developments in consumer bankruptcy law, a lively discussion erupted among a group of 40-50 local practitioners over Bay Area Chapter 7 panel trustees’ increased reliance upon lengthy questionnaires and blanket document requests [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/san-jose-bankruptcy-lawyers-raise-concerns-over-perceived-trustee-abuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In re Penrod, 611 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 2010)  An Opportunity for California Bankruptcy Attorneys &#8212; But Maybe Not For Long</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/penrod-an-opportunity-for-california-bankruptcy-attorneys-but-maybe-not-for-long/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/penrod-an-opportunity-for-california-bankruptcy-attorneys-but-maybe-not-for-long/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Schimmel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Bankruptcy Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars and Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanging Paragraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=7109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 9th Circuit has ruled that to the extent that an automobile lender rolls the negative equity from a trade-in into a new acquisition loan that part of the loan is not a purchase money security interest.  In re Penrod, 611 F.3d 1158 (9th Cir. 2010).   The ruling in Penrod is in apparent contrast to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/penrod-an-opportunity-for-california-bankruptcy-attorneys-but-maybe-not-for-long/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Top 7 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Pleadings to Watch for Customers Plus Bonus Tips for Protecting Your Interests When a Company Files for Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/the-top-7-chapter-11-bankruptcy-case-pleadings-to-watch-for-customers-plus-bonus-tips-for-protecting-your-interests-when-a-company-files-for-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/the-top-7-chapter-11-bankruptcy-case-pleadings-to-watch-for-customers-plus-bonus-tips-for-protecting-your-interests-when-a-company-files-for-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randall Reese</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11 Bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=6622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have an investment in a company that has recently filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection? Or are you researching a potential investment in a company that recently filed for chapter 11? Learn about how to follow these companies&#8217; bankruptcy cases to protect your interests. To help, we&#8217;ve prepared the following presentation: The Top [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/the-top-7-chapter-11-bankruptcy-case-pleadings-to-watch-for-customers-plus-bonus-tips-for-protecting-your-interests-when-a-company-files-for-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Down to the &#8220;Core‟- New Concerns Arising From Stern v. Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/down-to-the-core%e2%80%9f-new-concerns-arising-from-stern-v-marshall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/down-to-the-core%e2%80%9f-new-concerns-arising-from-stern-v-marshall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Stone</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marshall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=6591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not since Northern Pipelineii has the U.S. Supreme Court rendered an opinion that could have such lasting consequences on the way attorneys practice bankruptcy law. In short, the Stern v. Marshall opinion reinforced the notion that Bankruptcy Judges are not Article III judges and thus, must be constrained accordingly. As the reader will likely note, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/down-to-the-core%e2%80%9f-new-concerns-arising-from-stern-v-marshall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billionaire Bankruptcies?</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/billionaire-bankruptcies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/billionaire-bankruptcies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Trezza</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Basics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics of Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Bankruptcy Exemptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring a Bankruptcy Lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real life Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankrupt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Can I keep my property if I file bankruptcy?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision to file bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decisions about bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[means test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Bankruptcy Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protecting assets in bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protecting assets with a bankruptcy attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qaulifying for chapter 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[should I file for bankruptcy?]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=5998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reports surface that wealthy socialite Patricia Kluge has filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection, many have wondered:  how can you file for bankruptcy when you are a billionaire? When United State bankruptcy laws were drafted, the focus was pro-debtor.  The idea was to provide a fresh start for people who had suffered under the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/billionaire-bankruptcies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anna Nicole Smith Will Live Forever in Stunning New Supreme Court Decision in Stern v. Marshall</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/anna-nicole-smith-will-live-forever-in-stunning-new-supreme-court-decision-in-stern-v-marshall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/anna-nicole-smith-will-live-forever-in-stunning-new-supreme-court-decision-in-stern-v-marshall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thad Bartholow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adversary Proceeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Case Law and Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real life Stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Nicole Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Armstrong Kellett Bartholow P.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DTPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDCPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisdiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magistrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Debt Collection Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/?p=5940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stern vs. Marshall Shakes the Bankruptcy World The Supreme Court issued a second opinion arising from the seemingly endless litigation over claims against the estate of the late Pierce Marshall (Anna Nicole&#8217;s elderly husband of one year before his death).  In this 5-4 split opinion released yesterday (June 23, 2011), the Supreme Court significantly limited [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nationalbankruptcyforum.com/bankruptcy-case-law-and-analysis/anna-nicole-smith-will-live-forever-in-stunning-new-supreme-court-decision-in-stern-v-marshall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

